forum sugestions

eM-Viper · Post by **eM-Viper** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:09 am

Dont suppose u can allow for larger avatars ^.^ 260x240 at least maybe

. Lazarus needs his awsome avatar to be a bit bigger

. After all your giving ppl 1GB to upload files ( i dont know if that is storage or if it is for alloted bandwith)

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:23 am

Well I hate having images on the left that are HUGE, I'll make it a little bigger, but not 260x240. That's for sure.

eM-Viper · Post by **eM-Viper** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:47 am

thats cool ^.^ thanks dude

nightscream · Post by **nightscream** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:50 am

Geesu wrote:Well I hate having images on the left that are HUGE, I'll make it a little bigger, but not 260x240. That's for sure.

thank you dude

pls post what size we may use then i can make a new one

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:51 am

120x120, can be 40kb in size

eM-Viper · Post by **eM-Viper** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:53 am

thanks, i just uploaded mine

Post by **Lazarus Long** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:52 pm

Hello, everybody:

Geesu wrote:120x120, can be 40kb in size

And that is because he's a generous guy, I wouldn't allow it that big (but I'm a mean SOB).

Regards,

Zapy · Post by **Zapy** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:40 pm

eM-Viper wrote:Dont suppose u can allow for larger avatars ^.^ 260x240 at least maybe . Lazarus needs his awsome avatar to be a bit bigger . After all your giving ppl 1GB to upload files ( i dont know if that is storage or if it is for alloted bandwith)

hum, where did you get that 1GB to upload... from?
"gee" i did see it know, its 1GB attatchment allowed for eatch users.
Geesu isnt that a little to mutch, i mean i can host a movie here if i want two

120x120 isnt that bigg it dosnt screw up the table like 240x240 would do

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:04 pm

1GB is allowed TOTAL, per user I think the most is like 5MB per person

Zapy · Post by **Zapy** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:06 pm

Geesu wrote:1GB is allowed TOTAL, per user I think the most is like 5MB per person

"buggy" addon then

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:07 pm

what's it doing?

Zapy · Post by **Zapy** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:08 pm

Geesu wrote:what's it doing?

well it says on my user that iwe got 1000 MB to use

Zapy · Post by **Zapy** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:10 pm

like this

well that didnt work

Code: Select all

Upload Error: Could not upload Attachment to ./files/screen_447.jpg.

i guess you havent given write options to www-data if you are running linux

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:13 pm

fixed

I just moved the forums, and didn't change the permssions...

Zapy · Post by **Zapy** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:20 pm

well lock at that i really workt but now my profile says:

so i think iwe got 1GB for uploads

time to check the settings Geesu?

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:22 pm

hehe, well maybe I'm just a nice guy!

Zapy · Post by **Zapy** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:23 pm

;D

Post by **Lazarus Long** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:32 pm

Hello, Geesu:

Geesu wrote:hehe, well maybe I'm just a nice guy!

Too nice for my taste, I wouldn't give them squat, or maybe 10 KB.

Anyway you can give all of them 1 GB because of that 230 TB fiber-optic multi-array storage box you have just installed in your system. And that is what you do to your money... tsk... tsk... tsk...

Cheers,

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:37 pm

LOL

I don't know how to change it.. I'd like to limit everyone to 10MB cept for admins

Supreme · Post by **Supreme** » Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:25 am

I think that it should say the # of posts under your name. Just a suggestion

Post by **Geesu** » Tue Jul 12, 2005 9:38 am

no I took that off

I don't want it to be a competition

Although your rank changes with the post count

Supreme · Post by **Supreme** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:04 pm

Really that's cool.

Competition LOL

I'm almost at 6,000 on the 4HM forums and I don't mean to post much. Like Jim Beam said:

Jim Beam wrote:Nearly 99% of what Supreme says is interesting

Post by **Lazarus Long** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 1:19 pm

Supreme wrote:
Jim Beam wrote:Nearly 99% of what Supreme says is not interesting

Oops, my spell checker went in action...

Post by **Geesu** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 3:08 pm

LOL !!!!

nightscream · Post by **nightscream** » Thu Jul 14, 2005 7:30 pm

that's a good one

Supreme · Post by **Supreme** » Fri Jul 15, 2005 11:43 am

Lazarus Long wrote:
Supreme wrote:
Jim Beam wrote:Nearly 99% of what Supreme says is not interesting
Oops, my spell checker went in action...

You ass lol. By the way, you added a word; You didn't change the spelling of anything.

Frozen Flame · Post by **Frozen Flame** » Sat Jul 16, 2005 3:03 am

Supreme wrote:
Lazarus Long wrote:
Supreme wrote:
Oops, my spell checker went in action...
You ass lol. By the way, you added a word; You didn't change the spelling of anything.

LOL

and it could have been a grammar checker as well as spelling

nightscream · Post by **nightscream** » Sun Jul 17, 2005 4:11 pm

you guys want a spell checker ask geesu if he wants to use this
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=208855

Frozen Flame · Post by **Frozen Flame** » Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:19 am

nightscream wrote:you guys want a spell checker ask geesu if he wants to use this
http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=208855

I think you just did ask him, i dont like spell checkers much tbh.